Thursday, March 11, 2010

First Taste

Interesting bottles for interested wine lovers

A selection of notes and videos from recent tastings – click on the links to go to the relevant page

January 2010 – A Quartet of Bordeaux reds (video)
January 2010 – A Torres take on low alcohol wine (video)
January 2010 – Assorted whites (video)
December 2009 – Cabernet Sauvignon (video)
December 2009 – Four ports (video)
December 2009 – Douro reds (video)
December 2009 – Sweet wines (video)
December 2009 – Australian Shiraz (video)
December 2009 – Chardonnay with and without Viognier (video)
December 2009 – Big Wine, Little Wine featuring Mâconnais whites and Rhône reds (video)
December 2009 – Pinot Noir (video)
December 2009 – Spanish reds (video)
December 2009 – Sauvignon, mostly Blanc (video)
December 2009 – Argentine reds Part II (video)
November 2009 – Argentine reds Part I (video)

Archive of earlier notes and videos

First Taste is now on-line! The First Taste column first appeared in Wine Magazine in around 1991, and subsequently in Wine International, Wine & Spirit and finally in Harpers Wine & Spirit. It’s now transferred to the Internet, but the aim is the same. My role is rather like that of a dating agency, introducing interesting bottles to interested wine lovers. Sometimes, they won’t get on – I can live with that, it would be dreadfully boring if we all liked the same wines (more on this here). But hopefully, the result will be beautiful music and a fulfilling long-term relationship.

Something about scores. You can read more about my views on the topic in this post, but to sum up quickly, I give medals, not marks. The scale from top to bottom runs as follows:-

  • T  (trophy) – I’d say this translated to 97-100
  • G  (gold) – or 92-96
  • S (silver) – or 87-91
  • B (bronze) – or 82-86
  • C (commended) – or 77-81
  • 0 (zero) – or 76 and below**

and I split these into five layers – S+, S(+), S, S(-) and S-, for example.

Wine merchants looking for more information about the First Taste section should send me an e-mail here.

** someone asked me, ‘Why score out of 100 and then really only from 76 onwards?’ That’s part of the reason I use the medals instead of 100 points. Wines I give ‘0′ to aren’t all of the same quality – some could be boring but drinkable, others could be actively nasty.